<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<>
  <node>
    <title>GreacenStanford082</title>
    <Collections>Letters to Stanford</Collections>
    <Contributor>Greacen Estate</Contributor>
    <Coverage>1974 Jan 25th</Coverage>
    <Creator>LHL</Creator>
    <Date>Wednesday, March 16, 2016</Date>
    <Format>TIFF</Format>
    <Identifier>GreacenStanford82</Identifier>
    <ItemDescription>Letter</ItemDescription>
    <Keywords>Edwardian, Artillery Mansions</Keywords>
    <Language>English</Language>
    <Path>https://www.niliteraryarchive.com/content/greacenstanford082</Path>
    <Publisher>LHL</Publisher>
    <Relation>LHL</Relation>
    <Rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA</Rights>
    <Scannedimage>https://www.niliteraryarchive.com/sites/default/files/GreacenStanford082.jpg</Scannedimage>
    <Source>LHL Archive</Source>
    <Transcript>﻿36 H.P.M.

received 25
26th January,&#039;74
replied 25 Jan

My dear Derek,

Many thanks for yr letter - hope yr cold has passed as quickly
as hoped for.

I had lunch yesterday with Cis Amaral,a very pleasant woman -
this was a kind of thank-you for getting me a cheque,though I&#039;m still
not paid up to date. She wd like to meet you and so would her assist-
ant,an agreeable young man - Gareth xxxxxxxx Marshallsea (2 L&#039;s in
his name,one I&#039;ve never seen before - xxxxxxxxx as indeed Amaral).
I took it on myself to invite both of them to lunch in our joint
names. Wednesday sometime,I suggested. What do you think ? They both
strike me as reliable people:the young fellow asked me if I wd like
copies,for instance,and immediately got what I asked for and suggested
I shd leave my other stuff with  them and collect it all later. It was
all waiting for me when I went back to the office. None of the
Gerard Werson cleverness but good old-fashioned common sense. We went
to a pub across the road which is pleasantly Edwardian though not
good value. There&#039;s an Italian restaurant just beside the entrance
to Artillery Mansions and I suggest we try it as a foursome.

Read with pleasure yr notice of Eobt Armstrong&#039;s book (I
reviewed it for Valerie). Have paused to reread it  it: means yr review not
Armstrong&#039;s bloody book!
Heaven knows,talent is rare, as poet or critic,but a man can at least
get the bloody titles and dates right! Suggest that Armstrong shd write a
new book called &quot;Freedom from Talent and How It May Be Achieved &quot;.
(As for the Roy Campbell episode,his account is a load of--------)

Now for Foxing. I very much appreciate yr comments and detailed
textual emendations. I&#039;ve acted on most of these. Thank Peggie for
her suggestion of an active verb. The verb has been activated.
Fox is a great man for activity. I enclose new versions. There are 21
pieces now,though I have cheated: one is a Haiku and xxxxxxx
piece consists of random notes. Now I must look at them as a series
and do a wee bit of polishing,perhaps. Then look for what John Atkins
used to call a &#039;rubbisher&#039;.

That&#039;s all the noo.

Love to you both - Robert
</Transcript>
    <Type>Text</Type>
  </node>
</>
