<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<>
  <node>
    <title>GreacenStanford007</title>
    <Collections>Letters to Stanford</Collections>
    <Contributor>Greacen Estate</Contributor>
    <Coverage>1972 Mar 13th</Coverage>
    <Creator>LHL</Creator>
    <Date>Wednesday, March 16, 2016</Date>
    <Format>TIFF</Format>
    <Identifier>GreacenStanford7</Identifier>
    <ItemDescription>Letter</ItemDescription>
    <Keywords>Compulsive, Holbrook</Keywords>
    <Language>English</Language>
    <Path>https://www.niliteraryarchive.com/content/greacenstanford007</Path>
    <Publisher>LHL</Publisher>
    <Relation>LHL</Relation>
    <Rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA</Rights>
    <Scannedimage>https://www.niliteraryarchive.com/sites/default/files/GreacenStanford007.jpg</Scannedimage>
    <Source>LHL Archive</Source>
    <Transcript>﻿No. 62

13 March 1972

My dear Derek,

Yes,indeed,David H is hardly what one xxxxx
might call lucid. He’s a compulsve writer; and
compulsive writing often makes hard reading.
I tried to read the pamphlet but gave up. Lord,
I am not (intellectually) worthy.

Well,to take the Holbrookian xxxxxxxxxx
taste out of your (literary) mouth I enclose a
small selection from one Simmons. I don’t greatly
admire him,but I’ve read worse; and at least I
know what he’s getting at.

I wonder if that note about W.H.A. will
stimulate controversy.

What did yr bookseller think of the
Gascoyne offering ?

Love to you both-
Robert
</Transcript>
    <Type>Text</Type>
  </node>
</>
